Is Soreness a Reliable Marker of Progress in Lifting?
As someone who has spent the last five years powerlifting, I've often found myself questioning the relationship between soreness and actual progress in my lifts. The general consensus seems to be that if you're sore, you must have stimulated your muscles enough to promote growth. But is this really true?
When considering the concept of soreness, we typically refer to Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS), which is that achy feeling you get after a hard workout. It often follows intense sessions, particularly when trying new exercises or increasing intensity. But here's where it gets tricky: soreness doesn't always correlate with muscle growth or strength gains. For instance, you can have a great training session without experiencing soreness, yet still improve your 1RM in the squat or bench press.
To better analyze this, I looked at my training log and noted periods of high soreness versus periods of low soreness. I found that my PRs didn't necessarily align with how sore I felt the following day. There were weeks when I crushed my lifts and barely felt a thing, and others where I could hardly walk yet saw minimal improvement in my overall performance metrics.
In terms of programming, if you're utilizing a method like 5/3/1 or nSuns, the focus should really be on progressive overload and ensuring you hit your MEV (Minimum Effective Volume) and MAV (Maximum Adaptive Volume) rather than relying on soreness as a guide. If you're progressing in weight or reps, or if your RPE is decreasing over time, that should be the primary indicator of your gains, not the soreness you feel.
So, how do you guys view soreness? Is it a valid marker of your training effectiveness or just a side effect of pushing hard in the gym? I'm curious about your experiences with this.
TL;DR: Soreness isn't always a reliable indicator of progress; performance metrics should be the focus.